Sign up for regular news, views and insights about corporate governance

Name
Email
Company
Job title
Industry

Close

Setting the benchmark in corporate integrity

Just how flexible is the UK employment market?

Government declares that “firms have a duty to hire Britons” but what are the implications for employers?

Employers have a social responsibility to take on and train local young people, rather than taking the “easy option” of employing skilled workers from overseas, a Tory minister has said. In recent media interviews, skills minister Matthew Hancock said businesses that give local youngsters on-the-job training end up with more loyal and motivated workers.

Employing more local workers would also aid economic recovery, he argued, calling on businesses to consider their social duty as well as commercial interests. His controversial comments are reminiscent of Gordon Brown’s 2007 call for “British jobs for British workers” — and sparked similarly fierce debate. Surely such an approach amounts to discrimination, and downplays the merits of a flexible labour market? Or is it time for UK businesses that rely on migrant workers to rethink their recruitment culture?

The Government has effectively said yes, the time has come. Its sights are firmly set on getting to grips with immigration, as its divisive new “Illegal immigrants? Go home or face arrest” campaign suggests, and it has backed the minister’s comments. And with the Government expanding its apprenticeship scheme and launching a traineeship scheme, both available only to people living in England, businesses are being given more incentive to recruit locally. So, what should employers do? Can recruitment processes be tweaked to boost local employment without falling foul of the law?

The first thing worth noting is that EU nationals have the right to be treated as equal to UK nationals with regards access to employment. This means UK employers cannot simply target jobs at people from the local population; with limited exceptions, posts have to be open to applications from EU nationals. In the same vein, the resident labour market test that is used to give UK residents a degree of priority over migrants for sponsored skilled positions also extends its protections to European nationals. Any change to this approach would be likely to create conflict between domestic immigration policy and EU legislation.

So there is little scope for employers to reduce their reliance on European workers — who make up around 70 per cent of the migrant workforce. The 30 percent of migrant workers who hail from beyond the EU cannot be marginalised in favour of local workers either. All UK employers are subject to the terms of the Equality Act 2010, which protects individuals from discrimination on the basis of race (including nationality or national origin).

Advertising roles exclusively for EU nationals could amount to race discrimination. Companies could potentially justify such a move if they can show it to be a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim, but it falls to the courts to determine whether the justification is adequate and case law in this area is limited — so it is a risky measure.

In short, the minister’s call for companies to support local employment smacks of passing the buck. Although corporate social responsibility is undeniably — and increasingly — important, there is little that employers can do within the bounds of the law to reduce their reliance on migrant workers. It falls to the Government to provide adequate immigration controls and systems of education and training for the “local young people” they are supposedly campaigning for.

Although various legislative and policy changes have been made, the Government seems increasingly keen to place the onus on employers. A case in point was its decision to close the Tier 1 (General) and Tier 1 (Post-Study Work) categories to new applicants.  This has forced more workers down the Tier 2 route, which requires employers to take on various recordkeeping and reporting duties.

Furthermore, the economic arguments for reducing net immigration are questionable.  A July 2013 report from the Office for Budget Responsibility says increased net inward migration would in fact improve the UK’s economic outlook. Be that as it may, the Government looks set to continue tightening the screws on immigration, illegal or otherwise, and using both stick and carrot to encourage employers to recruit more local workers. Throughout this, care must be taken by the Government to maintain a flexible labour market that can effectively respond to UK business needs and continue to compete in the global economy.

Natasha Chell, is a Partner at Laura Devine Solicitors where she runs a business team and is responsible for the firm’s compliance.

 

News

A cultural aversion to defined benefit pension plans

Defined benefit pensions come under scrutiny

Ecobank accused of fraudulent governance

The African bank is under investigation by the SEC following allegations of fraud by a suspended company executive

Diversity: missing the wood for the trees?

Much has been made of the lack of women on boards recently. But positive discrimination has it’s flaws, writes Melanie Wadsworth

British banks’ comedy of terrors

Recent banking fiascos have proved that British officials struggle to revive failing banks or produce meaningful reform, even if they haven’t noticed it themselves yet, writes Simon Johnson

Hedge fund group sues Cayman Islands over corporate governance reform

As local authorities strive to make hedge funds based in the islands more transparent, some mangers object

EADS says shareholders to get higher dividends in future

Airbus owner signals change in strategy that may benefit shareholders

Wal-Mart review compliance amidst bribery allegations in Mexico

Following bribery allegations that cost the company over $157m, retail giant reviews compliance operations

Japanese companies urged to reconfigure governance

A recent survey has indicated that investors are dissatisfied with the current system of governance commonly undertaken by Japanese companies, many urging for more comply-or-explain systems equivalent to that of EU-based companies

SASB set ambitious targets for reforming sustainability reporting

Sustainability advocate SASB is aiming to transform the way a number of core US industries report on their environmental and social practices

Notable reports

Some of the leading reportage in corporate governance

Just how flexible is the UK employment market?

Government declares that “firms have a duty to hire Britons” but what are the implications for employers?

Legal world “requires categorisation”

As the legal industry continues to boom, it’s becoming ever more challenging for firms to choose where to seek council. Corporate Governance Report spoke to World Finance Editor Alexander Redcliffe about the magazine’s legal awards

RBS shareholders file suit against bank and former directors

RBS shareholders have launched a class-action suit over the 2008 rights offering a few months before the bank was bailed out by British government

Tech Data delays annual report after regulator questions

US-based technology wholesaler made to delay the publication of its annual report after questions are raised about accounting practices of its UK subsidiary

Australian government launches mining probe

Australia’s securities regulator is set to launch a probe of the country’s biggest mining companies in a bid to crack down on selective briefings

Pay ratio disclosure leaves directors unconvinced

The SEC’s recent pay ratio proposal has given rise to criticism and suggestions that it is an ineffective way of curbing excessive executive pay