Sign up for regular news, views and insights about corporate governance

Job title


Setting the benchmark in corporate integrity

A self-governing model

Sime Darby’s self-governing model allows it to stay focused and nimble

Sime Darby is a diversified Malaysian multinational involved in key growth sectors such as plantations, property, motors, industrial equipment, and energy and utilities. It operates in over 20 countries, employing more than 110,000 people, and has a large, diverse shareholder base.

Sime Darby is a world leader in the production of certified sustainable edible oil. It produces 2.5m tonnes of crude palm oil each year (5 percent of the world’s total), 85 percent of which is sustainably produced. Over the years, the group’s property division has built townships housing more than 400,000 people, developing communities that have thrived for generations.

Sime Darby is the world’s third largest Caterpillar dealer, operating in 10 countries across the Asia Pacific. In the auto sector, the group represents 31 marques with a focus on premium and luxury brands such as BMW, Rolls-Royce, Porsche and Lamborghini.  The group also has interests in hospitals in Malaysia and Indonesia, and operates both river and sea ports in China.


Over its 100-year history, the Sime Darby Group has evolved, and not just as a thriving business concern. With the development of increasingly stringent governance and responsibility standards over the last few decades, Sime Darby has made the decision to entrench those values at its core.

This is a continuing effort and there is constant evaluation within the group of its operating, governance and ethical standards to ensure its commitment to corporate responsibility is met. The main challenge the group had to face when adopting more stringent governance standards, which included greater oversight and transparency, was ensuring the various businesses were still able to show sustainable growth and remain nimble.

Strength and flexibility
A strong governance framework is an essential part of Sime Darby’s strategy to maximise shareholders’ wealth. The size and diversity of the group’s operations require a dynamic self-governing model that balances the operating autonomy of the divisions with appropriate checks, balances and performance benchmarks. This does present certain challenges, given the group operates disparate businesses in regions as remote as Liberia, where it has a 220,000-hectare plantation concession, and the Pacific Islands, where it has Caterpillar dealerships.

The current model is sufficiently flexible for the divisions to be responsive to market dynamics at the local level, yet robust enough to ensure local practices are consistent with group policies on ethics and governance. The hallmark of Sime Darby’s governance framework is the two-tier board structure, headed by the Main Board and supported by Flagship Subsidiary Boards (FSBs). Each FSB is charged with operational oversight of its division but remains subject to the direction and counsel of the Main Board, particularly on matters of strategy and policy.

The structure is modular and FSBs can be added or removed as businesses are acquired or disposed of.  Clear terms of reference ensure the FSBs remain focused on all aspects of divisional operations. This allows the Main Board to take a broader perspective, looking at enterprise issues such as strategy, risk management and governance.


Each FSB is structured to ensure a balanced composition, with members drawn from the Main Board and senior management, as well as including independent industry experts. Sub-committees also support the Main Board. All nominations to the Main Board and FSBs are reviewed by the Nomination and Remuneration Committee (NRC), of which independent directors are a majority.

The roles of the Chairman, and the President and Group Chief Executive are distinct and separate. A dedicated Group Compliance Office (GCO) was established in February 2011 to assist with the implementation of a compliance management framework.

Developing standards
The management reporting system complements the two-tier board structure; each division has a management committee that is subordinate to the Group Management Committee. Reporting lines between the Group Head Office (GHO) functions and their divisional counterparts are clearly defined to ensure accountability and alignment of purpose. Finance and legal, in particular, are considered ‘gatekeeper’ functions that are capable of red-flagging potential issues and risks. Therefore, a direct reporting line has been created to the GHO.

In a similar vein, the audit and compliance functions report directly to the Governance and Audit Committee (GAC), while risk management reports directly to the Risk Management Committee. This ensures the independence of the audit and risk functions, which is crucial to the integrity of the governance framework. To further complement its self-governing framework, procurement and shared services are used as control tools, and centralised where possible to reduce the duplication of systems and increase effectiveness by reducing the risk of human error.

In 2007, the group adopted a new brand promise: “Developing Sustainable Futures”. With this move, the group announced its intention to seek a balance between financial growth, environmental stewardship and social sustainability across all its business activities. This commitment is constantly reviewed and assessed by various champions within the group, whether it is in governance and safety standards at one end of the responsibility spectrum or philanthropic assistance on the other.

For example, the group’s corporate responsibility programmes conducted through the plantation division focus on elevating socio-economic standards in various ways, including offering educational assistance, and improved public infrastructure and healthcare for the benefit of local communities.

As a signatory to the United Nations Global Compact (UNGC), the group strives to embed the 10 principles of the UNGC with respect to human rights, labour, environment and anti-corruption in its strategy, culture and day-to-day operations. The group shares this commitment to corporate responsibility with its employees and other stakeholders, including business partners.

Sime Darby was the first government-linked company to sign the Corporate Integrity Pledge introduced by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC). This Pledge is in accordance with the second initiative of the Government Transformation Programme to fight corruption in Malaysia.

Governance and transparency
As part of its on-going efforts to strengthen its self-governing structure, Sime Darby has launched several initiatives to inculcate a strong culture of ethics. The group rolled out the Code of Business Conduct (COBC) in nine different languages (and Braille) to directors and employees across its divisions and territories.

The COBC emphasises a zero-tolerance policy on corruption and is reinforced through various channels, including e-learning, classroom training, the intranet and the group’s website. Approved vendors are also required to sign a ‘Vendor Letter of Declaration’ to ensure adherence to the COBC. Appropriate channels for whistleblowing are available for complaints to be escalated to management. The Senior Independent Director (SID) directly oversees the whistleblowing function and ensures all reported violations are properly investigated.

Sime Darby also issued a Directors’ Manual and Directors’ Handbook, which provides a reference point for directors, while the Group Policies and Authorities (GPA) articulates its governance framework and limits of authority to all its employees. The GPA is available to all employees via the portal.

All corporate disclosures are made in a timely and accurate manner to the stock exchange. Corporate and business information is disseminated to all stakeholders in a uniform, fair and timely manner. Messaging is developed and coordinated centrally at Head Office, and departments engaged with different stakeholders are entrusted to communicate effectively and meaningfully.

The group maintains an investor-friendly website with up-to-date information, data, announcements and downloadable presentation materials. Sime Darby also maintains active dialogues with key governance stakeholders such as the MACC, Malaysian Anti-Corruption Academy and Transparency International-Malaysia, which are centred on the group’s anti-corruption initiatives. The GCO submitted its second report on the group’s anti–corruption activities to the MACC in July 2013.

Sime Darby is majority owned by a Malaysian government investment fund, but believes in upholding the rights of all its shareholders. The group has put in place the following shareholder protection mechanisms:
– Independent directors form a majority on the GAC and the NRC;
– Appointing a SID to whom shareholders and other stakeholders may raise their concerns;
– Whistleblowing policy that provides employees, shareholders and other stakeholders with an avenue to report, in good faith, any suspected wrongdoing;
– Disclosure of related party transactions involving directors, major shareholders and persons connected to them; and
– Open letter responses to queries raised by a Malaysian organisation representing minority shareholders, which are openly shared at annual general meetings.

Sime Darby has won the Corporate Governance Report award for Best Corporate Governance, Malaysia, 2013.



Michael Woodford, king of whistleblowers

The former Olympus CEO exposed a $1.7bn fraud at the heart of one of Japan’s most important corporations, and became a symbol for whistle-blowers everywhere

Carl Icahn gives Apple a boost

Apple’s market value rose by an estimated $17bn after billionaire investor Carl Icahn tweeted his support for the company. Shares have since hit a seven-month high

A new model for financial reportage

A widely accepted problem of financial disclosure and reportage is that no two institutions use the same methods

A cultural aversion to defined benefit pension plans

Defined benefit pensions come under scrutiny

Gunaxi: Bribe or gift?

The efforts of multinational companies to do business in China is marred by the tradition of Gunaxi – the concept of courting clients and networking that traditionally involves gift giving

Tech Data delays annual report after regulator questions

US-based technology wholesaler made to delay the publication of its annual report after questions are raised about accounting practices of its UK subsidiary

Barclay’s share sale to plug capital hole

Barclay’s must raise £12.8bn to cover new regulatory demands

Redefining corporate responsibility: award winners 2013

Organisations are seeking to correct past workplace models, taking stock and embarking upon a new age of responsibility. Here, the Corporate Governance Report celebrates those firms carrying the governance torch

Health audit ceases force’s IT system

Surrey Police forced to abandon failed multi-million pound computer system

Ecobank accused of fraudulent governance

The African bank is under investigation by the SEC following allegations of fraud by a suspended company executive

Community spirit

Research has shown that companies giving back to the communities in which they work tend to enjoy better long-term results

Strategic CSR stops small companies being overshadowed

The 2013 Ethics and Leadership Conference has highlighted the need for companies within the same industry to group together to exercise their corporate social responsibility

SASB set ambitious targets for reforming sustainability reporting

Sustainability advocate SASB is aiming to transform the way a number of core US industries report on their environmental and social practices