Sign up for regular news, views and insights about corporate governance

Name
Email
Company
Job title
Industry

Close

Setting the benchmark in corporate integrity

Hedge fund group sues Cayman Islands over corporate governance reform

As local authorities strive to make hedge funds based in the islands more transparent, some mangers object

The Cayman Islands are home to over 9,400 hedge funds, harbouring assets estimated to be worth close to $2.2trn. It has long been a popular investment destination, but over recent years, local government has faced calls from the international community to modernise its regulation, and in particular, make it more transparent. But a fiduciary services company based in the island has taken legal steps against the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority to prevent the regulator from legislating on any transparency or corporate governance reforms.

Investors with funds in the Cayman Islands were severely hit by the crash of 2008, partly because of fund director’s misguided decisions in trying to protect themselves against fast withdrawals. The large-scale losses prompted investors to insist the Monetary Authority to increase regulation, especially when it comes to directorship rules.

Investors have also voiced their concerns about the lack of transparency offered them by fund managers and directors. There are currently no regulations in place in the islands that would make fund directors file publicly accessible information about their operations, making it difficult for investors to remain in the loop about their interests. Since 2008 steps have been taken by the Monetary Authority to produce a directory of funds, managers and directors, a step in the way to becoming a more transparent jurisdiction.

But DMS Management, a fiduciary services company based in the Caymans and purporting to represent a number of local fund directors has filed a suit challenging the decision. One of the main points of contention is a proposed piece of legislation that would limit the number of funds directors can act in; investors hold that they have no way of ascertaining the number of fund relationships their directors hold, or whether there might be conflicts of interest. But DMS, which has been fingered by the FT last year as acting as a contractor of director services, argues that directors act rather like doctors in that they can service hundreds of clients independently.

DMS has filed an injunction against the regulator in an attempt to prevent what they see as “Poor predetermined outcomes deriving from CIMA’s arbitrary and exclusionary consultation process.”

In a recent editorial Jeffrey D Sachs suggests that the current situation in the Caymans, is unsustainable. The Bank for International Settlements has recently reported that the Cayman banking system has an estimated $1.4trn in liabilities and assets; in an island with a population of 57,000 that equals about $24m per resident. “Cayman Island board members often sit on dozens or even hundreds of boards, offering essentially no oversight or accountability,” he wrote. “This house of cards is a mortal threat to the world economy, as well as an abuse of basic financial practices. It is reckless.”

Don Seymour, the founder of DMS, allegedly attends between 400 and 500 board meetings a year. “I have 158 relationships and someone might gasp at that, but the key thing to realise is that I’m a full-time director: this is all I do every single day.” His company provides professional independent directors to sit on boards of Cayman Island-based companies with the purpose of protecting the rights of investors.

So far the CIMA has not published its list of hedge funds and directors.

 

News

Just how flexible is the UK employment market?

Government declares that “firms have a duty to hire Britons” but what are the implications for employers?

Australian government launches mining probe

Australia’s securities regulator is set to launch a probe of the country’s biggest mining companies in a bid to crack down on selective briefings

IASB chairman defends stance on prudence

Despite criticism, accountancy regulator’s chairman says the downgrading of prudence from a fundamental concept is justified

ASIC pushes ahead with annual report reforms

Australian regulator demands more information on strategy from public companies in their annual financial statements

A self-governing model

Sime Darby’s self-governing model allows it to stay focused and nimble

Michael Woodford, king of whistleblowers

The former Olympus CEO exposed a $1.7bn fraud at the heart of one of Japan’s most important corporations, and became a symbol for whistle-blowers everywhere

Social business collaboration enhances corporate communications

Social media technologies offer unprecedented digital opportunities to share information, communicate and collaborate which are now being translated into a means of internal corporate communication management

A cultural aversion to defined benefit pension plans

Defined benefit pensions come under scrutiny

EU seek bloc-wide corporate governance laws

The European Corporate Governance and Company Law Conference looks to somewhat bolster shareholders’ duties and rights across the EU in protecting against corporate misgivings

Carl Icahn gives Apple a boost

Apple’s market value rose by an estimated $17bn after billionaire investor Carl Icahn tweeted his support for the company. Shares have since hit a seven-month high

Wal-Mart review compliance amidst bribery allegations in Mexico

Following bribery allegations that cost the company over $157m, retail giant reviews compliance operations

Boards under threat as shareholders demand more power

Activist shareholders demand right to action by written consent, but risk undermining board authority

British banks’ comedy of terrors

Recent banking fiascos have proved that British officials struggle to revive failing banks or produce meaningful reform, even if they haven’t noticed it themselves yet, writes Simon Johnson

Notable reports

Some of the leading reportage in corporate governance